Robotics

Why Americans Face a Flood of Political Text Messages

As the US midterm elections approach, millions of Americans are being flooded with an overwhelming volume of political text messages, raising concerns about privacy and voter fatigue.

Radwan AbdulhadiEditor and technology writer

Published: October 31, 2026 · Updated: October 31, 2026 · 4 min read

Why Americans Face a Flood of Political Text Messages — Image: The Verge

The Scale of the Political Text Message Flood

Ahead of the US midterm elections, mobile phone users across the country are facing an unprecedented barrage of unhinged political text messages. The sheer magnitude of this issue has made escaping political outreach nearly impossible, even for individuals who have never made a political donation.

While the exact total varies, industry trackers have quantified the massive growth in political messaging. Call-blocking company Robokiller previously found that 15 billion political texts were sent in 2022, a surge driven in part by a Supreme Court decision that made it easier to send mass calls and texts without consent.

Alex Quilici, CEO of spam protection service YouMail, provides an even higher informal estimate of 25 billion to 30 billion political texts for the current election cycle. Quilici notes that this volume represents a steady plateau to about 10 percent higher compared to previous election cycles.

Exemptions and Consumer Watchdog Warnings

Navigating these communications can be frustrating for consumers because political outreach operates under different rules than traditional telemarketing. Teresa Murray, PIRG consumer watchdog director, points out the distinct challenges posed by current regulations.

“The bad news is that political calls and political texts are exempt from the do-not-call-list rules,” Murray explains. She adds a note of optimism, however, pointing out that once election results are finalized following Tuesday, the daily influx of campaign texts, calls, and emails will naturally taper off.

Despite the temporary nature of the election cycle, consumer advocates emphasize that individuals should remain vigilant against secondary threats hidden within the campaign noise. Alongside legitimate messages, bad actors frequently inject malicious scams.

How Campaigns Acquire Consumer Phone Numbers

A common point of confusion for recipients is how political campaigns obtain their contact details without prior consent or past donations. The answer lies largely within the opaque ecosystem of data brokers.

Data brokers aggregate information from both public and private sources, ranging from public voter rolls and loyalty programs to online behavior tracked by web advertising cookies. Campaigns leverage these amalgamated databases to infer political alignment and likelihood to donate.

However, this information processing is frequently flawed. Sara Geoghegan, consumer privacy program director at the Electronic Privacy Information Center, highlights the inaccuracies resulting from this unregulated ecosystem.

“Sometimes multiple people use the same device. Sometimes people have similar names. Sometimes people move,” Geoghegan notes, adding that the absence of strict privacy regulations leaves room for biased, inaccurate, and invasive data practices.

Mitigation Strategies and Long-Term Solutions

While immediate relief before election day remains difficult to achieve, consumers can take several actionable steps to manage the influx of messages. Reporting spam numbers and sending "stop" requests help cellular service providers identify and eventually filter recurring nuisance numbers.

Recipients who suspect unauthorized use of autodialers can also file a formal complaint with the Federal Communications Commission or their respective state attorney general.

Furthermore, cybersecurity and privacy experts strongly advise against clicking any links contained in messages from unknown numbers. If individuals wish to contribute financially to a campaign or political action committee, they should navigate directly to the official website rather than interacting with text links.

For long-term protection, Murray suggests limiting instances where personal phone numbers are shared during routine online activities, such as shopping portals. Utilizing secondary communication options, such as free VoIP numbers like Google Voice, can also help silo potential spam away from personal messaging apps.

The Broader Impact on Civic Engagement

Beyond mere annoyance, privacy advocates warn that aggressive surveillance and constant text bombardments may produce unintended negative consequences for democratic participation as a whole.

Geoghegan expresses concern that invasive data practices and relentless messaging push citizens away from political participation. When bombarded with unwanted messages, some individuals reconsider future donations and civic involvement entirely.

Ultimately, advocates argue that the burden of defense should not rest solely on individual consumers. Addressing the root cause requires reigning in data-trading companies and halting the deployment of harmful surveillance technologies in civic life.